Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have decided on their attendance at King Charles' coronation. One of them is going, and the other is staying with their kids in California.
Meghan Markle And Prince Harry's Coronation Could Affect Their Marriage?
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have always put up a united front in public. Last week, Buckingham Palace was pleased to announce that Prince Harry would join his father's coronation, but his wife and kids would remain in California.
Initially, fans thought either both were going or skipping the event altogether. However, they made a compromise.
According to royal commentator Christopher Andersen, the coronation will be "a very uncomfortable, highly awkward situation for Harry" after all the things he said and wrote about his family. Thus, it was understandable that he left Markle and their children Archie, 3, and Lilibet, 1, at home.
He also said this about Markle via Fox News Digital:
"One has to wonder, however, how Meghan feels about all this. Does she fully support Harry’s decision to go solo? Or did she beg him to stay behind with her and the children in Montecito? Was this a bone of contention between them?"
The expert added that the royal couple should have decided together because it would affect their marriage. Their decision "shows a level of maturity and unity in the marriage that is to be admired" or causes friction among them.
He continued:
"If Meghan is only reluctantly supporting Harry’s decision or opposes it, you can only imagine what a strain that might put on their marriage going forward."
Why Meghan Markle Snubbed King Charles' Coronation?
Finding Freedom co-author, Omid Scobie claimed that among the factor that Markle weighed in on for her decision is their son Archie's 4th birthday, which falls on the same day as the King's coronation.
However, Daily Mail Diary editor and broadcaster Richard Eden had another thing in mind why Markle skipped the historical event. When he appeared on Daily Mail Royals' Palace Confidential, he told host Jo Elvin that the Sussexes didn't get their demands and it was probably the reason Markle stayed behind.
Eden said:
"They wanted apologies [and] this type of thing. And from everything I've heard, you know that simply hasn't happened. And let's be clear, I think that's why Meghan isn't coming because they haven't got what they wanted."
Meanwhile, New Zealand-born British journalist Dan Wootton claimed on GB News that Markle was avoiding public humiliation. She reportedly didn't want to be booed.
Wottton said:
"She doesn't want to be booed. The reality is, if she had attended the coronation, she would have been booed. The British public was going to boo her, and Meghan knew that, and she didn't want to put herself through that."
What do you think is the real reason Meghan Markle decided to skip King Charles' coronation? Do you believe she fully supports Prince Harry's attendance at his father's coronation without her?
Stay tuned for more news and updates about King Charles' coronation.
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE: Prince Harry Shock: Prince William Reportedly Used 'Soul-Crushing Vow' to Convince Brother but Meghan Markle's Husband Didn't 'Fully Trust' Him
Explore new topics and discover content that's right for you!
Pop Culture